X
  • Home
  • Find a Collaborative Divorce Professional
  • The Collaborative Team
  • Collaborative Practice Overview
    • Why does Collaborative Divorce work?
    • Who can use Collaborative Divorce?
    • How does Collaborative Divorce work?
    • Is Collaborative Divorce right for you?
    • How to select a Collaborative Professional
    • FAQs
  • Alberta Divorce Information
  • About Us
  • Collaborative Divorce Alberta Blog
  • Contact Us
Logo for Collaborative Divorce Alberta Association, the best resource for anyone who is looking for Alberta divorce and is interested in a collaborative divorce in Alberta.

Collaborative Divorce Alberta

  • Home
  • Blog
  • For Professionals
  • Members Area
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Find a Collaborative Divorce Professional
    • Why collaborative divorce?
  • The Collaborative Team
  • Collaborative Practice Overview
    • Why does Collaborative Divorce work?
    • Who can use Collaborative Divorce?
    • How does Collaborative Divorce work?
    • Is Collaborative Divorce right for you?
    • How to select a Collaborative Professional
    • FAQs
  • Alberta Divorce Information
  • About Us

Collaborative Divorce Alberta Blog

Articles: November 2016

11/03/16

Courts now uphold your choice of Appropriate Dispute Resolution process

How binding is the standard clause in a settlement contract, a.k.a. Minutes of Settlement, that requires the parties to attempt mediation or a 4 way negotiation meeting before being allowed to bring a court application? For the most part, Queen’s Bench Justices in family chambers have been upholding and showing respect for the requirements of that clause, and would adjourn or refuse to hear a court application when the person responding or defending against the court application brought that clause to the Justice’s attention. The Court of Appeal in Henderson  v. Henderson, 2016 ABCA 256, recently reversed the decision of a Queen’s Bench Justice who did not uphold that clause. In the Henderson decision, the Court of Appeal wrote that, “having agreed to this requirement, the [person bringing a court application] cannot simply ignore it, and there was no basis for the Chambers Judge to dispense with mediation. Dispensing with mediation merely rewards the [person who brought the court application] for breaching the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.” Court of Appeal decisions are binding on all Queen’s Bench Justices. So now all Queen’s Bench Justices, without exception, will need to uphold the requirements of that clause in a settlement contract....

Categories

  • Child Custody and support
  • Child Support
  • Children and Divorce
  • Client Resources
  • Collaborative Divorce
  • Common Law Relationships
  • Dividing Assets
  • Divorce Help
  • Grey Divorce
  • In The News
  • Region
  • Resources
  • Retirement Post-Divorce
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • November 2020
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • July 2015
  • December 2011
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • Find a Collaborative Divorce Professional
  • The Collaborative Team
  • Collaborative Practice Overview
  • Alberta Divorce Information
  • About Us

©2025 Collaborative Divorce Alberta   |   Site by Odvod and Ferris Consulting